Architecting Resilient and Compliant Secure DevOps Pipelines in Cloud-Based Retail Systems
Keywords:
Secure DevOps, Cloud Retail Systems, Compliance Engineering, Continuous Software EngineeringAbstract
The rapid evolution of cloud-based retail platforms has introduced unprecedented opportunities for scalability, innovation, and global market reach, but it has also amplified the exposure of retail systems to complex cybersecurity threats and regulatory compliance risks. Secure DevOps, increasingly referred to as DevSecOps, has emerged as a transformative paradigm that integrates security practices seamlessly into the continuous software engineering lifecycle. This study provides a comprehensive, theory-driven and empirically grounded examination of Secure DevOps architectures within cloud-enabled retail environments, drawing extensively on contemporary scholarship in continuous delivery, DevOps culture, cloud security, and automated compliance. Anchored in the analytical framework articulated by Gangula (2025), the paper advances the argument that retail cloud ecosystems require a distinct form of security orchestration that is not merely additive but structurally embedded across organizational, technical, and cultural layers.
Through a design science and mixed-methods methodological orientation, the research synthesizes existing systematic literature, case study evidence, and conceptual modeling traditions to construct a multi-layer Secure DevOps framework tailored to retail operations. The analysis demonstrates that compliance obligations, such as data protection, transaction integrity, and auditability, cannot be effectively achieved through post hoc controls but must be embedded directly into automated pipelines, container orchestration platforms, and cloud-native governance mechanisms. Results derived from the interpretive synthesis of literature reveal that continuous security monitoring, infrastructure-as-code, container hardening, and security-as-culture are mutually reinforcing mechanisms that enhance resilience, reduce breach likelihood, and strengthen regulatory adherence.
The discussion situates these findings within broader debates on continuous software engineering and cloud security, highlighting tensions between agility and control, as well as between innovation and compliance. By integrating insights from DevOps capability models, critical infrastructure protection research, and audit quality theory, this article contributes a robust theoretical and practical foundation for future research and implementation. The study concludes that Secure DevOps in retail cloud environments represents not simply a technological shift but a fundamental reconfiguration of how organizations conceptualize trust, risk, and accountability in digital commerce.
References
1. Gangula, S. (2025). Secure DevOps in retail cloud: Strategies for compliance and resilience. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(05), 109–122.
2. Bosch, J. (2014). Continuous software engineering: An introduction. Continuous software engineering. Springer International Publishing.
3. Khan, R. A., et al. (2022). Systematic literature review on security risks and its practices in secure software development. IEEE Access, 10, 5456–5481.
4. Sultan, S., Ahmad, I., and Dimitriou, T. (2019). Container security: Issues, challenges, and the road ahead. IEEE Access, 7, 52976–52996.
5. Shahin, M., Babar, M. A., and Zhu, L. (2017). Continuous integration, delivery and deployment: A systematic review on approaches, tools, challenges and practices. IEEE Access, 5, 3909–3943.
6. Alouffi, B., et al. (2021). A systematic literature review on cloud computing security: Threats and mitigation strategies. IEEE Access, 9, 57792–57807.
7. Fitzgerald, B., and Stol, K. J. (2017). Continuous software engineering: A roadmap and agenda. Journal of Systems and Software, 123, 176–189.
8. Kumar, R., and Goyal, R. (2020). Modeling continuous security: A conceptual model for automated DevSecOps using open-source software over cloud. Computers and Security, 97, 101967.
9. Sanchez-Gordon, M., and Colomo-Palacios, R. (2020). Security as culture: A systematic literature review of DevSecOps. Proceedings of the IEEE ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops, 266–269.
10. Rajgopal, S., Srinivasan, S., and Zheng, X. (2021). Measuring audit quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 26, 559–619.
11. Senapathi, M., Buchan, J., and Osman, H. (2018). DevOps capabilities, practices, and challenges: Insights from a case study. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 57–67.
12. Read, W., Report, T., and Takeaways, K. (2016). Agile and DevOps adoption drives digital business success. Forrester Research.
13. Perry, D. E., Sim, S. E., and Easterbrook, S. M. (2004). Case studies for software engineers. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, 736–738.
14. Prates, L., Faustino, J., Silva, M., and Pereira, R. (2019). DevSecOps metrics. In Information systems: Research, development, applications, education. Springer International Publishing.
15. Shajadi, A. (2019). Automating security tests for web applications in continuous integration and deployment environment.
16. Wieringa, R. J. (2014). Design science methodology for information systems and software engineering. Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
17. Sahid, A., Maleh, Y., and Belaissaoui, M. (2018). A practical agile framework for IT service and asset management. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 20(4), 71–92.
18. Hulak, H., et al. (2022). Dynamic model of guarantee capacity and cyber security management in the critical automated systems. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Conflict Management in Global Information Networks, 102–111.
19. Anakhov, P., et al. (2023). Protecting objects of critical information infrastructure from wartime cyber attacks by decentralizing the telecommunications network. Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems, 240–245.
20. Stahl, D., Martensson, T., and Bosch, J. (2017). Continuous practices and DevOps: Beyond the buzz. Proceedings of the 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications.
21. Subedi, B. P. (2016). Using Likert type data in social science research. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Sciences, 3(2), 36–49.
22. Tashakkori, A., and Creswell, J. W. (2007). Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 207–211.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Sebastian Keller (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
