Multiscale Numerical Control and High-Performance Simulation for Continuous Casting: Integrating Model Predictive Control, Lattice Boltzmann Methods, and GPU Acceleration

Authors

  • Anil R. Menon Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Melbourne Author

Keywords:

continuous casting, model predictive control, parabolic PDEs, lattice Boltzmann method

Abstract

This article presents an integrative, theoretically rigorous, and methodologically detailed exposition on the design, analysis, and numerical implementation of advanced control strategies for continuous casting processes, emphasizing model predictive control for nonlinear parabolic partial differential equation (PDE) systems, lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) based fluid–thermal simulation, and high-performance computing (HPC) implementations on graphics processing units (GPUs). By synthesizing methodological advances from state-of-the-art control theory applied to unsteady PDEs (Yu et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2018) with kinetic-based fluid modelling and thermodynamics captured by lattice Boltzmann frameworks (d’Humières et al., 2002; He et al., 1998; Lallemand & Luo, 2003), and the practical acceleration strategies using CUDA-enabled GPU computing (Micikevicius, 2009; NVIDIA, 2010; Mudigere, 2009), the paper articulates a comprehensive pipeline: from mathematical problem formulation and discretization strategy, through controller design and stability considerations, to efficient implementation patterns that respect memory access, parallelism, and numerical accuracy on modern heterogeneous architectures. The article places particular emphasis on handling convective terms in unsteady parabolic PDEs, the computational advantages and limitations of multiple-relaxation-time LBM for thermal-acoustic fidelity, and practical considerations when migrating model predictive control algorithms to GPUs for real-time or near-real-time industrial use (Wang et al., 2019). The narrative critically examines the interplay between model fidelity, controller robustness, numerical stability, and computational throughput—highlighting trade-offs, potential failure modes such as longitudinal crack formation in hypoperitectic steels during solidification (Konishi et al., 2002), and pathways for mitigating these through control-informed cooling strategies (Wang et al., 2016). The synthesis culminates in an extended methodological blueprint suitable for researchers and practitioners seeking to develop publication-ready, production-grade simulation-control systems for continuous casting and analogous thermofluid processes.

References

1. Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Deng, R., & Yin, Y. (2023). New DY-HS hybrid conjugate gradient algorithm for solving optimization problem of unsteady partial differential equations with convection term. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 208, 677–701.

2. Wang, Y., Luo, X., & Wang, H. (2019). GPU-Based model predictive control of nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations system and its application in continuous casting. IEEE Access, 7, 79337–79353.

3. Konishi, J., Militzer, M., Samarasekera, I. V., et al. (2002). Modeling the formation of longitudinal facial cracks during continuous casting of hypoperitectic steel. Metallurgical & Materials Transactions B, 33(3), 413–423.

4. Yu, Y., Luo, X., Liu, Q., et al. (2018). Model predictive control of a dynamic nonlinear PDE system with application to continuous casting. Journal of Process Control, 65, 41–55.

5. Wang, Y., Luo, X. C., Yu, Y., et al. (2016). Optimal control of two‐dimensional parabolic partial differential equations with application to steel billets cooling in continuous casting secondary cooling zone. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 37, 1314–1328.

6. d’Humières, D., Ginzburg, I., Krafczyk, M., Lallemand, P., & Luo, L. S. (2002). Multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann models in three dimensions. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360, 437–451.

7. Dongarra, J., Moore, S., Peterson, G., Tomov, S., Allred, J., Natoli, V., & Richie, D. (2008). Exploring new architectures in accelerating CFD for Air Force applications. Proceedings of the HPCMP Users Group Conference.

8. He, X., Chen, S., & Doolen, G. D. (1998). A novel thermal model for the lattice Boltzmann method in incompressible limit. Journal of Computational Physics, 146(1), 282–300.

9. Lallemand, P., & Luo, L. S. (2003). Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: Acoustic and thermal properties in two and three dimensions. Physical Review E, 68(3), 036706.

10. Lee, V. W., Kim, C., Chhugani, J., Deisher, M., Kim, D., Nguyen, A. D., Satish, N., Smelyanskiy, M., Chennupaty, S., Hammarlund, P., et al. (2010). Debunking the 100X GPU vs. CPU myth: an evaluation of throughput computing on CPU and GPU. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, 38, 451–460.

11. McNamara, G. R., & Zanetti, G. (1988). Use of the Boltzmann Equation to Simulate Lattice-Gas Automata. Physical Review Letters, 61, 2332–2335.

12. Micikevicius, P. (2009). 3D finite difference computation on GPUs using CUDA. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on General Purpose Processing on Graphics Processing Units, 79–84.

13. Mudigere, D. (2009). Data access optimized applications on the GPU using NVIDIA CUDA. Master’s thesis, Technische Universität München.

14. NVIDIA. (2010). Compute Unified Device Architecture Programming Guide version 3.1.1.

15. Scalable Acoustic and Thermal Validation Strategies in GPU Manufacturing. (2025). International Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 5(01), 193–214.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Multiscale Numerical Control and High-Performance Simulation for Continuous Casting: Integrating Model Predictive Control, Lattice Boltzmann Methods, and GPU Acceleration . (2025). SciQuest Research Database, 5(09), 103-112. https://sciencebring.org/index.php/sqrd/article/view/32