Resilient Fog-Cloud Architectures and Fault-Tolerant Test Infrastructure for Large-Scale GPU Manufacturing: Integrating Edge Intelligence, Energy Prediction, and Verification Paradigms
Keywords:
Fog computing, fault tolerance, GPU manufacturing, power predictionAbstract
This article synthesizes contemporary conceptual foundations and applied methodologies for designing resilient fog–cloud computing architectures and fault-tolerant test infrastructure targeted at large-scale GPU manufacturing. The abstract summarizes the research problem, methodological approach, principal findings, and implications. Background: modern GPU manufacturing and deployment increasingly rely on distributed computation across cloud, fog, and edge tiers for tasks including in-line inspection, predictive power management, real-time quality control, and cryptographically secure telemetry aggregation (Prakash, Suresh, & Dhinesh Kumar, 2019; Deepika & Prakash, 2020). Problem statement: existing test infrastructures for GPUs often fail to simultaneously satisfy the competing demands of scalability, low latency, energy efficiency, and rigorous formal verification (Designing Fault-Tolerant Test Infrastructure for Large-Scale GPU Manufacturing, 2025; Huang, Tsai, Paul, & Chen, 2005). Methods: this work develops an integrative framework combining fog computing paradigms, machine-learning based power prediction, hybrid cloud storage and serverless HPC patterns, and formal verification tools (Labelled Transition System Analyser; Lambers, Ehrig & Orejas, 2006; Lohmann, Sauer & Engels, 2005). Results: descriptive analysis demonstrates how layered redundancy, consensus-inspired decision rules, and blockchain-augmented telemetry can jointly improve fault tolerance, reduce energy volatility, and maintain throughput under realistic manufacturing perturbations (Iyer, 2020; Yehia & Aljaafreh, 2023). Discussion: the paper interprets findings in light of trade-offs between latency, trust, and computational cost, examines limitations of current verification approaches, and maps a research agenda for automated model checking and fog-native testing. Conclusion: by synthesizing theoretical and applied work across distributed computing and verification communities, the proposed architecture offers a practical route to robust, cost-effective, and verifiable GPU testbeds capable of meeting future manufacturing scale-up.
References
. Prakash, P., R. Suresh, P. N. Dhinesh Kumar. Smart City Video Surveillance Using Fog Computing. International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, Vol. 10, March 2019, pp. 389-399. DOI: 10.1504/IJENM(2019).
2. Prakash, P., K. G. Darshaun, P. Yaazhlene, M. V. Ganesh, V. Vasuda. Fog Computing: Issues, Challenges and Future Directions. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), Vol. 7, December 2017, No 6, pp 3669-3673. https://DOI:10.11591/ijece.v7i6.pp3669-3673
3. Singh, B. S., M. Pratap, D. K. Sangeeta. Hardware Setup for VLC Based Vehicle to Vehicle Communication under Fog Weather Condition. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, Vol. 29, 2020, No 3s.
4. Designing Fault-Tolerant Test Infrastructure for Large-Scale GPU Manufacturing. (2025). International Journal of Signal Processing, Embedded Systems and VLSI Design, 5(01), 35-61. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijvsli-05-01-04
5. Deepika, T., P. Prakash. Power Consumption Prediction in Cloud Data Center Using Machine Learning. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2020, pp. 1524-1532. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i2
6. Sandeep, H. R., S. Thangam. A Hybrid Cloud Approach for Efficient Data Storage and Security. In: Proc. of 6th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES’22), 2022.
7. Iyer, G. N. Evolutionary Games for Cloud, Fog and Edge Computing – A Comprehensive Study. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 990, 2020, pp. 299-309. http://doi.org/:10.1007/978-981-13-8676-3_27
8. Yehia, I., A. A. Aljaafreh. Block Chain-Fog Computing Integration Applications. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 23, 2023, No 1, pp. 3-37.
9. Petrosyan, D., H. Astsatryan. Serverless High-Performance Computing over Cloud. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 22, 2022, No 3, pp. 82-92.
10. Huang, H., W.-T. Tsai, R. Paul, Y. Chen. Automated Model Checking and Testing for Composite Web Services. In Proc. of 8th IEEE Intern. Symp. on Object-Oriented Real-Time System Computing (ISORC’05), 2005, pp. 300-307.
11. Labelled Transition System Analyser (Version 2.2)http://wwwdse.doc.ic.ac.uk/concurrency/ltsa-v2/index.html
12. Lambers, L., H. Ehrig, F. Orejas. Conflict Detection for Graph Transformation with Negative Application Conditions. In Proc. of ICGT2006, pp. 61-76, 2006.
13. Lohmann, M., S. Sauer, G. Engels. Executable Visual Contracts. In Proc. IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing (VL/HCC 05), pp. 63-70, 2005.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Marcus R. Ellison (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.